Financial
Benefit
Transformer
oil fires are difficult to extinguish
During market
research
for explosions in the USA, it was
noticed that most of the sites were
equipped with fire fighting systems
which had failed to extinguish the
fire. This evidence was highlighted
recently by the National
Fire Protection Association Handbook,
Edition 2002,
Vol II Section 13, pages 292 & 293.
Because of the large number of fire
fighting system failures, the NFPA
Handbook emphasizes the Transformer
Protector technology for
acting before explosion. Click
for document #16
Damage cost due
to transformer explosions and fire
A synthesis on the damage cost of
transformer
explosions has been published. Click
for document #5.
The financial consequences often
exceed $100 million.
Transformer explosions and fire result
in: lost income, purchase of high-priced
replacement power, replacement of
transformers and surrounding equipment,
pollute the environment and negative
public relations. The damage caused
depends on the transformer location:
• Power
plant incidents result in very high
loss of revenue and can lead to company
bankruptcies if not insured. For
insurers, the projected cost reference
can approach $500,000 per MVA.
• Transmission
substation incidents can result in
the complete blackout of a region
or a country. Several well-known
cases have been recorded recently
(USA, UK, Italy, Spain, etc.).
• Distribution
transformer explosions in urban areas
can have disastrous financial consequences
approaching $1 billion in related
pollution and litigation costs. Transformer
ProtectorTM acts before any damage
is done
Purchasing the Transformer Protector:
• Saves
all equipment and buildings, since
the danger is channeled far away;
•
Enables
the quick internal repair of the
transformer and sharply reduces plant
outages;
•
Leaves the environment
unharmed.
The
Transformer Protector Financial Benefit
is outstanding.
Details of the Transformer Protector
Financial Benefit
are presented in Documents. Click for document #5.
To assess a technology for equipment protection, Corporate Risk Managers and
Insurers use
the following parameters:
| • |
MLEB (Maximum Loss Expectancy
Before) is the cost of the worst
recorded incident before installing
a protection. |
| • |
LEA (Loss Expectancy After)
represents the evaluation of
the damage cost of the worst
recorded incident with the chosen
protection after installation. |
| • |
CTC (Cost to Complete) is the
complete price of the protection,
including erection and tests.
The Protection Financial Benefit
(PFB) is a ratio between the
protection price (CTC) and the
damage cost reduction (MLEB -
LEA): PFB = CTC / (MLEB-LEA). |
For Corporate Risk
Managers and Insurers, if:
| • |
PFB < 1%, the
protective technology is strongly
recommended; |
| • |
1% = PFB = 4%, insurance companies
adjust their rates and premiums.
For the four incidents analyzed
in the publication Click
for document 5, calculations
have shown that the Transformer
Protector Financial Benefit was
far below the 1% criterion with
ratios ranging from 0.015% to
0.06%. |
When an incident
occurs, the transformer protector
compensates several thousand times
the investment.
|